Starmer insists he will ‘never walk away’ from task he has to change UK, as he urges Labour to stop feuding
Keir Starmer is speaking at an event in Hertfordshire.
He starts with a reference to the events of yesterday – saying there has been a lot of politics around recently.
But he is focused on the cost of living, he says. He says he knows what it is like to struggle, because when he was growing up his family couldn’t always pay their bills.
He says he leads the most working-class cabinet in history.
He says people are still being held back by their backgrounds.
He says that the system did not work for people like his brother, who spent “his adult life wandering from job to job in virtual poverty”. And other people are in the same situtation, he says.
He says he is fighting to help “young people who don’t get the opportunities they deserve”, and the “millions of people held back because of a system that doesn’t work for them”.
He says he wants to ensure people get the “dignity, the respect, the chance that they deserve”.
He goes on:
[There are some] people in recent days who say the Labour government should have a different fight, a fight with itself, instead of a fight for the millions of people who need us to fight for them.
And I say to them – I will never walk away from the mandate I was given to change this country, I will never walk away from the people that I’m charged with fighting for, I will never walk away from the country that I love.
Britain is a compassionate country, he says. “Given half the chance, we’ll help each other out,” he says.
He says the real fight is not within the Labour party. It is with rightwing politics, and the politics of grievance. And he will be in that fight “as long as I have breath in my body”.
UPDATE: Starmer said:
I will never walk away from the mandate I was given to change this country, I will never walk away from the people that I’m charged with fighting for, and I will never walk away from the country that I love.
And that is the country who I truly believe we are, a compassionate, reasonable, live and let live country, a diverse country where, given half the chance, we’ll help each other out.
That is who we are as a country, and I want to serve every single part of that country, the country that I love.
The fight coming up in politics, the real fight is not in the Labour party. It’s with the right-wing politics that challenges that, the politics of Reform, the politics of divide, divide, divide, grievance, grievance, grievance.
That will tear our country apart. That is the fight that we are in, and I will be in that fight as long as I have breath in my body.
Key events
-
Reform UK threatens to withdraw funding from university after its debating society declines to host Q&A with Reform MP
-
Starmer says Labour has ‘pulled together as a party’, as he says he backs Anas Sarwar ‘100%, without reservation’
-
Minister says new court records database being developed after protests about Courtsdesk archive being wiped
-
Minister defends MoD contract with Palantir, saying it built on deal struck by Tories, and Mandelson not involved
-
Starmer insists he will ‘never walk away’ from task he has to change UK, as he urges Labour to stop feuding
-
Eluned Morgan says she won’t give ‘running commentary’ on Westminster – but Wales better off when Labour succeeds
-
Burnham says Britain will only be able to build ‘new economy’ with wholesale electoral reform
-
Burnham says Labour needs to ‘dial down’ on constant briefing against each other
-
Burnham says he hopes Mandelson scandal will end political culture ‘too close to wealth and power’
-
Burnham backs Starmer staying on as PM, saying UK needs ‘stability’, while also urging PM to be more ‘inclusive’
-
Burnham says he has never argued politicians can ignore bond markets
-
Burnham says government should commit to building 500,000 council and social homes by end of decade
-
Burnham speaks at Resolution Foundation conference on ‘Unsung Britain’
-
Starmer tells cabinet Sarwar’s comments yesterday won’t stop Labour fighting to make him first minister
-
Scottish Tories say it’s ‘ludicrous’ for Douglas Alexander to campaign alongside Sarwar given Starmer disagreement
-
Douglas Alexander insists Starmer and Sarwar can work together despite leadership row – citing Blair/Brown precedent
-
Welsh first minister Eluned Morgan says she backs Starmer, but says he must ‘deliver for Wales’
-
Councils and campaigners welcome government’s £1bn community energy investment plan
-
Miliband says he does not agree with Streeting’s claim about Labour having ‘no growth strategy’ in message to Mandelson
-
Miliband rules out running again for Labour leadership
-
Miliband says he does not know if Sarwar’s move against Starmer plotted with others, and urges party to ‘move on’
-
Miliband says PM has ‘burning passion’ to end ‘class divide’ – but that it’s ‘balderdash’ to call this class war
-
Miliband says Starmer facing down leadership threat must lead to ‘moment of change’, with more ‘clarity’ and ‘boldness’
Reform UK threatens to withdraw funding from university after its debating society declines to host Q&A with Reform MP
Reform UK has threatened to remove funding from a university where the debating society declined an invitation from the party to host a Q&A with one of its MPs.
Zia Yusuf, head of policy at Reform, claimed this amounted to his party being banned and suggested that, if Nigel Farage became PM, Bangor University would no longer get “a penny” of state funding.
Yusuf was responding on social media to a post from the debating and political society at the university, which said that Reform had asked it to host a Q&A with Sarah Pochin, one of its MPs, and Jack Anderton, a Reform adviser.
The society said it would not be hosting the Q&A proposed by Reform. It said it had “zero tolerance for any form of racism, transphobia or homophobia displayed by the members of Reform UK” and it urged other university debating unions to joint it in keeping “hate out of our universities”.
Yusuf replied:
Bangor University have banned Reform and called us “racist, transphobic and homophobic”.
Bangor receives £30 million in state funding a year, much of which comes from Reform-voting taxpayers.
I am sure they won’t mind losing every penny of that state funding under a Reform government.
After all, they wouldn’t want a racist’s money would they?
And he also posted these follow-up messages on social media.
The Vice Chancellor of Bangor University is paid £287,000 a year, and the university employs 32 people on more than £100k.
All to indoctrinate their students so much they ban an MP from the party leading national polls from speaking at a debate.
Why should taxpayers fund this?
Worth noting for the Bangor University situation, the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 does not apply in Wales.
Even things the Tories did that they call “wins” were weak and supine under scrutiny.
That’s why the radical left captured the country on their watch.
A spokesperson for the university told the BBC that the university “welcomes debate across the political spectrum” and that student societies express their own views, not the university’s.
Starmer says Labour has ‘pulled together as a party’, as he says he backs Anas Sarwar ‘100%, without reservation’
Keir Starmer has said that he supports Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, “100%, without reservation”.
Asked to respond to Sarwar announcing yesterday that he thinks Stamer should stand down as PM, Starmer said:
I’ve got a huge respect for Anas Sarwar. Obviously, he made his views known yesterday.
But I want to be really clear that I’m 100% supportive of Anas Sarwar to be the first minister in Scotland, he’d be an incredible first minister and I support him 100%, without reservation.
Talking about the events of yesterday more generally, Starmer said:
What’s happened over the last few days is that we’ve pulled together as a party and been absolutely crystal clear about the fight we need to have.
And that’s the fight on behalf of all the people in this country who don’t get the respect and dignity and the chance they deserve in life, that is the fight that we are in, that’s who we’re fighting for.
Keir Starmer has said that he will lead Labour into the next election.
Speaking to broadcasters at his visit to a community centre in Hertfordshire, when he was asked if he would be Labour leader at the next election, he said “yes”, adding that he had a “five-year mandate” to “deliver change”.
(This is one of those questions which journalists feel obliged to ask, but where the answer is almost meaningless because leaders generally feel obliged to reply yes. The only exceptions are when you get the rare combination of a leader a) already contemplating retirement, and b) honest or naive enough to want to disclose that to a reporter.)
Minister says new court records database being developed after protests about Courtsdesk archive being wiped
Officials from the Ministry of Justice are working on a new way of sharing details of court cases with journalists after the existing platform was told to delete its records over data protection concerns, MPs were told.
Sarah Sackman, a justice minister, said she accepted that journalists found the Courtsdesk service valuable. But, responding to a Commons urgent question tabled by the Conservatives, she claimed that the government had to shut the Courtdesk archive because an AI company was using it to access sensitive personal data.
Kieran Mullan, a shadow justice minister, suggested the government wanted to cover up what is actually happening in the courts.
Explaining the decision to order Courtsdesk to wipe its archive, Sackman said:
This private company, Courtsdesk, has been sharing private, personal, legally sensitive information with a third-party AI company that includes potentially the addresses, the dates of birth, of defendants and victims. This is a direct breach of our agreement with them.”
The cessation of our agreement with Courtsdesk does not change the information available to the public about what carries on in our courts and nor does it change the information available to journalists.
I recognise that the sort of service that Courtsdesk provided was useful for journalists because it collated the information and presented it neatly, and it’s for that reason that officials in my department are continuing to work, as we always planned to do, on an alternative platform, one that allows us to make the information available, but to maintain the guardrails in relation to data protection.
As PA Media reports, Courtsdesk has been used by more than 1,500 journalists, the company claims. His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) told the firm to delete the details in November after what it deemed “unauthorised sharing” of court data. Last week the government refused calls for the decision to be reversed, meaning it must be deleted within days.
In the Commons Mullan accused the government of making it “harder for journalists to report the truth”. He said Courtsdesk had been a “huge success”.
He went on:
What is it they’re worried about? Could it be that they want to hide the fact that thousands of criminals will escape justice under their sentencing bill? Could it be that when they erode our rights to jury trials, they don’t want the public to hear about what results?
Sackman said journalists would still be able to access court information.
Commenting on the UQ, George Greenwood, an investigative reporter at the Times, said:
What Sarah Sackman said at the dispatch box today is simply wrong.
It is not physically possible for journalists to attend every single court and to obtain the kind of information that Courtsdesk provided in searchable form.
This shuts out the press and undermines open justice.
Minister defends MoD contract with Palantir, saying it built on deal struck by Tories, and Mandelson not involved
Peter Mandelson had “no influence” on the Ministry of Defence signing a contract with American tech giant Palantir, a defence minister has said, amid “serious questions” about his links to the company. Luke Pollard was speaking in the Commons responding to an urgent question. PA Media says:
Palantir signed a three-year £421m deal with the MoD in December 2025 to continue providing services like data integration, analytics and AI platforms.
Questions are being asked about whether disgraced former US ambassador Lord Mandelson was involved in securing this deal, as he held shares in Global Counsel, a lobbying firm hired by Palantir.
Pollard told MPs: “As the defence secretary [John Healey] has said, the contract was his decision, and his decision alone. Peter Mandelson had no influence on the decision to award this contract.”
He noted that the previous Conservative government signed a three-year enterprise agreement with Palantir in 2022, and said the new deal builds on that.
Pollard added that the government has secured new commitments from Palantir, including to have its European defence headquarters in London, £1.5bn investment into the UK and a new defence mentoring scheme to help British SMEs (small and medium sized enterprises) access the US market.
Asking the UQ, shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: “Following Peter Mandelson’s sacking as US ambassador, serious questions surrounding his influence on MoD contracts have emerged, and upon which we have had no meaningful answers.”
Pointing out that the Palantir contract was granted by direct award, rather than open competition, Cartlidge called for “transparency”.
He said: “The question is, to what extent Peter Mandelson and his firm Global Counsel, in which at the time he was a controlling shareholder, benefited from privileged access not available to potential UK competitors, which was used to deliver a quarter of a billion pound defence contract to a client of Global Counsel, without competition?”
Responding, Pollard said the MoD uses Palantir tools and technology “on a daily basis to support the operations and wider data analytics”, adding: “I’m sure he’s not suggesting that we shouldn’t be maintaining access to those vital capabilities.”
The minister also said the Government intends to “publish as much material as we can as soon as reasonably possible”, and that work is “under way” to make that happen.
The chair of the defence committee and Labour MP for Slough, Tan Dhesi, asked: “Why was this particular contract not subject to the usual procurement processes, competitive processes?”
Pollard said that the agreement covered existing services and where there is a “robust technical justification for using Palantir products and services”.
He added that it was “justified under the Procurement Act” and that all procurement procedures were followed with a transparency notice.
Labour MPs including Clive Lewis, Dawn Butler and Neil Duncan-Jordan all criticised the MoD’s contract with Palantir.
Starmer insists he will ‘never walk away’ from task he has to change UK, as he urges Labour to stop feuding
Keir Starmer is speaking at an event in Hertfordshire.
He starts with a reference to the events of yesterday – saying there has been a lot of politics around recently.
But he is focused on the cost of living, he says. He says he knows what it is like to struggle, because when he was growing up his family couldn’t always pay their bills.
He says he leads the most working-class cabinet in history.
He says people are still being held back by their backgrounds.
He says that the system did not work for people like his brother, who spent “his adult life wandering from job to job in virtual poverty”. And other people are in the same situtation, he says.
He says he is fighting to help “young people who don’t get the opportunities they deserve”, and the “millions of people held back because of a system that doesn’t work for them”.
He says he wants to ensure people get the “dignity, the respect, the chance that they deserve”.
He goes on:
[There are some] people in recent days who say the Labour government should have a different fight, a fight with itself, instead of a fight for the millions of people who need us to fight for them.
And I say to them – I will never walk away from the mandate I was given to change this country, I will never walk away from the people that I’m charged with fighting for, I will never walk away from the country that I love.
Britain is a compassionate country, he says. “Given half the chance, we’ll help each other out,” he says.
He says the real fight is not within the Labour party. It is with rightwing politics, and the politics of grievance. And he will be in that fight “as long as I have breath in my body”.
UPDATE: Starmer said:
I will never walk away from the mandate I was given to change this country, I will never walk away from the people that I’m charged with fighting for, and I will never walk away from the country that I love.
And that is the country who I truly believe we are, a compassionate, reasonable, live and let live country, a diverse country where, given half the chance, we’ll help each other out.
That is who we are as a country, and I want to serve every single part of that country, the country that I love.
The fight coming up in politics, the real fight is not in the Labour party. It’s with the right-wing politics that challenges that, the politics of Reform, the politics of divide, divide, divide, grievance, grievance, grievance.
That will tear our country apart. That is the fight that we are in, and I will be in that fight as long as I have breath in my body.
Eluned Morgan says she won’t give ‘running commentary’ on Westminster – but Wales better off when Labour succeeds
At first minister’s questions in Cardiff, Eluned Morgan, the Welsh first minister, reaffirmed her support for Keir Starmer “in the job he was elected to do”. (See 11.18am.)
She told the Senedd:
Keir Starmer was elected with a clear mandate to be the prime minister of the United Kingdom. I support him in the job he was elected to do.
When Labour succeeds in government, the people of Wales become better off and that is my key concern.
My job as first minister is to improve the lives of people in Wales, not to provide a running commentary on Westminster politics.
Burnham says Britain will only be able to build ‘new economy’ with wholesale electoral reform
Andy Burnham ended his contribution by recalling the Labour MP Paul Goggins, who represented Wythenshawe and Sale East and who died in 2014. He said Goggins was his mentor when he was a young MP. Goggins “was just dedicated to the underdog”, he said.
Burnham went on:
When I came into parliament, I remember [Goggins] said something to me very early on that I’ve never forgotten. He said ‘The point of being here is you’ve got power and you should use all of it, every bit of it, for people who have little power or none at all. But what you will find is most people in here are using their power for people who’ve already got too much.’
And the truth of what he said become more and more apparent to me during my time in parliement.
And I do just finish on that … I think we’ve had a political culture that hasn’t served the common good for quite a while. And I’m not making this a right and left thing. It’s been there in all parties. And it hasn’t serve the interests of Unsung Britain.
And I just think Britain needs to really refocus in this moment. It is a generational moment. If we’re not going to rethink things now, then when are we going to do it?
And I do come back to it. We have to rethink the whole way of working of politics.
The power in too few hands in Whitehall, in Westminster, creates that situation where the manipulation of power by vested interests works against the common good … I have seen that far too much in my political life, and I believe strongly now we need electoral reform, political reform, the replacement with the House of Lords with an elected senate of the nations and regions.
We need root and branch reform across Whitehall and Westminster. And it is only by a new politics we will we start to build a new economy. I don’t think you can do one without the other.
Burnham says Labour needs to ‘dial down’ on constant briefing against each other
Q: Was Anas Sarwar wrong to call for Keir Starmer to resign? Do you think the government can deliver the promises you want? And would you rule out a leadership challenge?
Burnham replied:
What I’m calling for very clearly today is for the unity, to create the stability to give the government the platform to focus on all of the things that I’m talking about today.
I think we’ve got to get away from the sense that everything is a challenge. I put myself forward [as a byelection candidate] but I was saying – I spoke to the prime minister, I spoke to the government – we need to get a strong sense of a stronger team again than there has been in recent times. And that, I think, is what needs to come from this.
We need to dial down all of this constant briefing. It’s seemingly a bit endless some of the anonymous briefing going round.
Burnham said he would like to see Labour focusing on ensuring Reform UK does not win the Gorton and Denton byelection.
Burnham says he hopes Mandelson scandal will end political culture ‘too close to wealth and power’
Q: Is your support for Keir Starmer qualified?
Burnham said his support for Starmer “wasn’t qualified or guarded”. He went on:
I praised the government. I think they have broken with the governments I was in that didn’t allow people to reregulate buses, that didn’t renationalise at the railways, that didn’t have as ambitious plans around housing.
So they’ve come forward with the big ambitions.
He said there was a need for “greater unity” in the Labour party. He went on:
I think we are at a generational moment in politics. Actually, I do feel recent events have drawn a heavy line under a political culture that was too close to wealth and power and too distant from the lives of people that we’re talking about today.
So the government, in my view, should just now lean completely into that theme, and work with devolved authorities like the one I lead.
Burnham is now taking questions.
Q: Does Keir Starmer have your full support? And how long has he got to turn things around?
Burnham says Starmer has his support. And he did when Burnham applied to be a candidate in the Gorton and Denton byelection, he says.
He says the government is doing things that support working-class Britain. He says it has supported initiatives he is pursuing in Manchester, such as giving 16-year-olds free bus travel, which is important for education, and developing the MBacc (Manchester baccalaureate).
Burnham backs Starmer staying on as PM, saying UK needs ‘stability’, while also urging PM to be more ‘inclusive’
Burnham highlighted rail nationalisation as an example of the new economic approach he thinks the UK needs.
And then, in a reference to Keir Starmer, he went on:
Having frozen rail fares, we now need to start talking about lowering rail fares. That’s the benefit that public control can bring, and I believe it’s what we should be working towards, together with the government, and also bringing pace and focus to lowering the cost of other of life’s essentials.
To do that requires stability, and I make my own call for that today across the Labour party.
Of course, stability comes from greater unity, and that would be helped by a more inclusive way of running the party. But recent events makes that now feel possible.
That was an endorsement – but a relatively cautious one. In his speech, Burnham did not refer to Starmer directly.
Burnham says he has never argued politicians can ignore bond markets
Burnham said that he had never said politicians should ignore the bond markets.
To be clear about something, I have never said Britain should ignore the bond markets, or even blamed them.
What I do say is that it is the decisions of politicians from the 1980s onwards that have left us in hock to them, with little headroom and room for manoeuvre.
It is only politicians who can take us out of that position with better choices.
Burnham is referring to a comment he made in an interview with the New Statesman last year.
Burnham says government should commit to building 500,000 council and social homes by end of decade
Burnham said that privatisation led to “a huge transfer of power away from unsung Britain and, towards, if you like, the better off half”.
He said it was time to reverse this.
Following recent events, I think the time has come to call an end to this era in British politics, when politicians got too close to wealth, too seduced by the notion that deregulated markets would provide the solution when in fact they have been the problem for those on the lowest incomes.
Burnham said he would like to see the government commit to building 500,000 council and social homes by the end of this decade.
Burnham said that “Unsung Britain” stopped being a priority for the Westminster government around 40 years ago.
Before that, “a collective approach defined public policy in terms of repairing the basics,” he said. He added that created “the health, wealth and life chances of working-class Britain”.
Burnham said that, when he was growing up in the 1970s, “it was the combination of available council housing and good technical education which provided the foundations for working-class aspiration”.
Those foundations for prosperity were both broken up, he said.
Burnham speaks at Resolution Foundation conference on ‘Unsung Britain’
At the Resolution Foundation Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, is speaking at a conference on “Unsung Britain”. There is a live feed here.
The conference covers issues raised in this report from the thinktank. The RF uses “Unsung Britain” to refer to the poorer half of working-age families.
Here is a summary of its key points.
Starmer tells cabinet Sarwar’s comments yesterday won’t stop Labour fighting to make him first minister
Keir Starmer chaired a meeting of the political cabinet today, as well as normal cabinet. Labour has sent out a readout, and it says that Starmer thanked his colleagues for their support yesterday. He also said he wanted Anas Sarwar to become first minister in Scotland, despite Sarwar saying yesterday he no longer backed Starmer. And Starmer said the government would continue with a “relentless focus” on the priorties of voters.
A Labour spokesperson said:
The prime minister thanked political cabinet for their support. He said they were strong and united.
He highlighted the ways ministers are delivering on their mandate to change the country, including investing in local communities through Pride in Place and restoring economic stability, which has led to six interest rate cuts and lower mortgage costs for families.
He said the government would continue its relentless focus on the priorities of the British people, including tackling the cost of living.
The prime minister said that the whole of the Labour party wants Anas Sarwar to become first minister and will fight for a Labour government in Scotland.
Scottish Tories say it’s ‘ludicrous’ for Douglas Alexander to campaign alongside Sarwar given Starmer disagreement
The Scottish Conservatives say it is “ludicrous” for Douglas Alexander, the Scottish secretary, to campaign alongside Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, when Alexander backs Keir Starmer and Sarwar doesn’t.
In an interview this morning Alexander defended this arrangement. (See 11.59am.)
But Rachael Hamilton, the deputy Scottish Tory leader, has released an open letter to Alexander urging him to take a side. She says:
With less than three months to go until polling day at Holyrood, Douglas Alexander must choose whether he wants to remain in Keir Starmer’s cabinet or run Scottish Labour’s election campaign – because he can’t credibly do both.
If he’s backing Starmer to remain as prime minister, he is completely at odds with Sarwar and his fellow campaign co-chair Jackie Baillie and must relinquish this role.
The idea that he can stand alongside Sarwar, who wants Starmer to go, and remain in the PM’s cabinet is for the birds. It’s ludicrous, contradictory and unsustainable.
Douglas Alexander insists Starmer and Sarwar can work together despite leadership row – citing Blair/Brown precedent
Libby Brooks
Libby Brooks is the Guardian’s Scotland correspondent.
Keir Starmer and Anas Sarwar remain united in their determination to oust the SNP from government in Scotland – according to Scottish secretary Douglas Alexander this morning, less than 24 hours after Sarwar called for Starmer to step down.
Asked what on earth Scottish Labour voters should make of the chaotic scenes of yesterday, Alexander told BBC Radio Scotland:
There was a sincere and genuine disagreement between the Scottish Labour leader and the UK prime minister yesterday, but the task at hand remains the same, which is that there’s a judgment to be made in just over three months’ time as to who we want to be the government of Scotland.
Referring to his own previous experience of the ongoing battles during the New Labour years, he added:
There have been some pretty tough days in the Labour family over the years, and I can attest to that having observed the differences, to put it mildly, between Gordon Brown and Tony Blair – but together they were able to change the country.
Alexander insisted that Starmer and Sarwar were “both individuals who have strong and clear opinions, but who do not bear grudges”. He went on:
I’ve spoken to the prime minister in the last few hours. I’ve spoken to Anas, and I can tell you sincerely and authentically that there is a willingness to work together.
I know both of these men, I talked to them both last night. Kier Starmer was on the phone to me yesterday evening making very clear he remains determined that Anas Sarwar is the first minister of Scotland after May. Equally, Anas is clear that he has set out his position, he will work hard to take the fight to the SNP in the coming months.
#Starmer #walk #Burnham #joins #Labour #figures #backing #politics #live #Politics