\n<\/p>\n
According to Reuters<\/a>, Instacart is currently getting the regulatory equivalent of a throat-clearing from the FTC, which has sent the grocery delivery platform a civil investigative demand regarding its AI-powered pricing tool, Eversight. Put another way, the agency wants to know why some people are paying substantially more for their organic granola than others.<\/p>\n The issue came to light after a study revealed that shoppers are seeing fairly different prices<\/a> for identical groceries from the same stores \u2014 up to 23% higher prices in some cases. Instacart says these price tests were randomized, not ties to an algorithm that targets customers based on their browsing history. But when people are already anxious about affording eggs, that distinction probably doesn\u2019t mean much.<\/p>\n Dynamic pricing isn\u2019t new or necessarily nefarious. Harvard Business School will tell you it\u2019s how digital platforms stay competitive. Airlines use it, hotels use it, Uber famously uses it. Companies argue that it helps balance supply and demand, maximizes profitability, and creates win-win scenarios.<\/p>\n But there\u2019s a difference between paying surge pricing for a ride home from the bar and paying extra for groceries (food isn\u2019t optional). So while the investigation doesn\u2019t prove wrongdoing, it\u2019s hardly shocking that the FTC \u2014 which has investigated data-driven pricing strategies<\/a> by other companies \u2014 is reportedly asking questions. In an economy where everyone\u2019s feeling squeezed, AI-driven price testing of kitchen essentials was bound to attract attention.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n