{"id":4361,"date":"2025-12-17T05:24:41","date_gmt":"2025-12-17T05:24:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/?p=4361"},"modified":"2025-12-17T05:24:41","modified_gmt":"2025-12-17T05:24:41","slug":"vulnerable-republican-blasts-choice-to-send-health-insurance-spiking-as-political-malpractice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/?p=4361","title":{"rendered":"Vulnerable Republican blasts choice to send health insurance spiking as &#8216;political malpractice&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/AP25350655733672-e1765934440981.jpg?w=2048\" \/><\/p>\n<p>House Republican leaders are determined to push ahead with a\u00a0GOP health care bill\u00a0that excludes efforts to address the\u00a0soaring monthly premiums\u00a0millions of Americans will soon endure as pandemic-era tax credits for people who buy insurance through the Affordable Care Act expire at year\u2019s end.<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Speaker Mike Johnson\u00a0had discussed the prospect of allowing more politically vulnerable GOP lawmakers a chance to vote on their amendment that would temporarily extend pandemic-era subsidies for ACA coverage. But after days of private talks, leadership sided with the more conservative wing of the conference, which has assailed the subsidies as propping up a failed ACA marketplace.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe looked for a way to try to allow for that pressure release valve,\u201d Johnson said Tuesday at the Capitol. \u201cIn the end, it was not \u2014 an agreement wasn\u2019t made.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The maneuvering surrounding the health care vote all but guarantees that\u00a0many Americans\u00a0will see substantially higher insurance costs in 2026. In the Senate, a bipartisan group was still trying to come up with a compromise to extend the subsidies, which fueled this year\u2019s\u00a0government shutdown. But senators made clear that any potential legislation would likely wait until January, after the holiday break.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, House Republicans will pursue their 100-plus-page health care package that focuses on long-sought GOP proposals designed to expand insurance coverage options for small businesses and the self-employed. A test vote is expected Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>The Republicans\u2019 package would clamp down on middlemen called pharmacy benefit managers who work to manage drug costs and process claims for insurance plans. The bill would also expand access to what\u2019s referred to as association health plans, which would allow more small businesses and self-employed individuals to band together and purchase health coverage.<\/p>\n<p>An analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates the package would decrease the number of people with health insurance by an average of 100,000 per year over a 2027-2035 window, while reducing the federal deficit by $35.6 billion.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Failing to address expiring insurance subsidies \u2018political malpractice\u2019<\/h4>\n<p>Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., blasted the leadership\u2019s decision to not allow for a vote to temporarily extend the health insurance subsidies, saying it amounted to \u201cpolitical malpractice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lawler, who hails from a competitive district, noted that most people who get their health coverage through the Affordable Care Act live in states that President Donald Trump won and said the changes proposed for a temporary extension were \u201cconservative reforms.\u201d He also criticized Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries for not pushing Democrats to support a pair of bipartisan extension efforts.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou have two leaders who are not serious about solving this problem,\u201d Lawler said of Johnson and Jeffries.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the centrist Republicans indicated they would not try to block the Republican leadership\u2019s measure from coming to a vote.<\/p>\n<p>Johnson defended the House GOP\u2019s bill, which includes priorities that Republicans have been working on for several years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a long list of things that we know will reduce premiums, increase access and quality of care,\u201d Johnson said. \u201cThe Democrats have zero ideas, zero concepts and zero legislative plans on anything they\u2019ll propose other than just subsidizing the broken system.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Democrats said even if the bill passes the House, it will not pass the Senate, where it would need 60 votes and bipartisan support to advance. They said it was not a serious effort to address rising costs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMillions will be priced out of their coverage, and those who can still afford it will get less while paying more,\u201d said Rep. Suzan DelBene, chair of the House Democratic campaign arm. \u201cRepublicans are ignoring the pain, the pain we\u2019re seeing across the country for everyday Americans. And make no mistake, it is going to cost them the majority.\u201d<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">GOP bill focuses on insurance options and cost-sharing<\/h4>\n<p>During Trump\u2019s first term, his administration sought to expand access to association health plans that don\u2019t have to offer the full menu of benefits required under current law. The option offers lower premiums for small businesses and self-employed people, but the policies are likely to cover fewer benefits. A federal judge who\u00a0struck down\u00a0the administration\u2019s effort in 2018 said the plans were were \u201cclearly an end-run\u201d around consumer protections required by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.<\/p>\n<p>The House Republican plan would also restore government funding for cost-sharing reductions, or CSRs, a type of financial help that insurers give to low-income ACA enrollees on silver-level plans that reduces their share of costs like deductibles and copays.<\/p>\n<p>From 2014 until 2017, the federal government reimbursed insurance companies for CSRs \u2014 but in 2017, the Trump administration stopped making those payments. To make up for the lost funds, insurance companies hiked premiums for silver-level plans \u2014 a complicated move that ended up increasing the financial assistance many enrollees get to help pay for premiums.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, health analysts say that while restoring funding for CSRs would likely bring down silver-level premiums, it could also have the unwelcome ripple effect of increasing many people\u2019s net premiums on bronze and gold plans.<\/p>\n<p>The provisions related to pharmacy benefit managers require the middlemen to disclose certain data about their operations to group health plans, with the hope that more transparency would reduce prescription drug costs.<\/p>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Senators revive talks of action in the new year<\/h4>\n<p>Almost two dozen Republicans and Democrats met late Monday to talk about a last-minute fix on the ACA tax credits after the Senate rejected two partisan health care bills last week. They emerged from the meeting discussing ways to end the stalemate, including a possible two-year extension of the subsidies with reforms that would narrow who could receive them. They also discussed adding some version of a GOP proposal to create new health savings accounts that would help people purchase insurance.<\/p>\n<p>Maine Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican who led the bipartisan meeting, said the group would like to announce a proposal this week. But there were still significant unresolved issues, including whether to include stricter language on abortion funding. Disagreements over abortion were one of the main sticking points in earlier talks that derailed a compromise.<\/p>\n<p>Senate Majority Leader John Thune said there\u2019s a \u201cpotential pathway\u201d to an agreement in January, but acknowledged, \u201cwe\u2019re not going to pass anything by the end of this week.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2014-<\/p>\n<p>Staff writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Ali Swenson contributed to this report.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>#Vulnerable #Republican #blasts #choice #send #health #insurance #spiking #political #malpractice<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>House Republican leaders are d&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4362,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[3361,4153,917,1394,600,597,603,4156,2437,4152,4154,4155,4151],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4361"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4361\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4362"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}