T<\/span>wenty-three-year-old<\/span> Sarah Roque had been in the Army for just over four years when a man fatally shot her in the head.<\/p>\n Roque wasn\u2019t in a war zone, and the killer wasn\u2019t an enemy combatant. It was Wooster Rancy, a fellow soldier stationed at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, who had gone to Walmart for trash bags on the last day Roque was seen alive in October 2024. The Army found her body in a dumpster behind the barracks.<\/p>\n \u201cEven now, I still can\u2019t believe it,\u201d her mother, Ana Roque, told The Intercept. \u201cThat murderers could exist in one of the supposedly safest places in the country.\u201d<\/p>\n A first-of-its-kind analysis by The Intercept found that in the Army, women are more likely to be killed by their fellow service members than by enemy combatants, in a reversal of the threat soldiers are trained to face. Between 2011 and August 2025, at least 41 women died by homicide in the Army \u2014 more than half of them at the hands of other service members<\/a> or veterans. Using Defense Department manpower data to calculate per capita death rates, The Intercept found that active-duty Army women face a higher risk of homicide than male soldiers, the opposite of national and global trends<\/a>.<\/p>\n The Intercept found that active-duty Army women face a higher risk of homicide than male soldiers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n In many cases, women in the Army are killed by current or former romantic partners. Over 70 percent of victims had an intimate relationship with the perpetrator at one point, and the rate of homicides among women soldiers from intimate partner violence<\/a> is at least three times higher than the national average<\/a>. In others, like Roque\u2019s case, it\u2019s unclear how male soldiers chose their victims.<\/p>\n \u201cThere was no connection between Sarah and Rancy. They never spoke, never texted, and their paths never crossed,\u201d said Ana Roque. Given that Rancy was convicted of murder in February<\/a>, Roque added, \u201cI can\u2019t complain about the prosecutors, they did their job. But my grievance is that they didn\u2019t push to uncover the truth behind why he did it.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n Research points to the military\u2019s hypermasculine <\/a>culture, which historically devalues women, as a contributing factor to high rates of violence against them. But the existing scholarship is insufficient, said Erin Siegal McIntyre, a journalism professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who has spent years digging into the hidden structures of militarized institutions.<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s no way to know how bad the problem really is,\u201d Siegal McIntyre said. \u201cThere is an abysmal amount of data collected on domestic violence perpetrated by law enforcement officers, for example, many of whom are former military.\u201d<\/p>\n Analyzing over 14 years of Defense Department death data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, The Intercept\u2019s investigation is the first to compare rates of violence against women in the Army to factors like duty location, jobs, and relationships with perpetrators. The FOIA data also reveals deaths not previously announced by the Army and the Department of Defense.<\/p>\n Violence against women in the military also appears to take a mental toll. In addition to the 41 women who died by homicide, another 128 died by suicide, the majority of them lower-ranking enlisted soldiers. From 2011 to 2024, the last complete year of data, homicide and suicide rates for women in the Army were double their equivalents for women nationwide<\/a>.<\/p>\n The Army doesn\u2019t make any of this public, and the Intercept\u2019s investigation has found flaws in what data collection currently occurs: Homicide and suicide death rates are not separated by gender<\/a> or calculated per capita, preventing deeper analysis and comparison.<\/p>\n There\u2019s also nothing publicly accessible on how many homicides are committed by service members, who their victims are, or where homicides occurred. The Defense Department\u2019s annual suicide report<\/a> doesn\u2019t note how many of the deceased had experiences with sexual assault or harassment.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, systems meant to protect women are being rolled back and dismantled.<\/p>\n In September, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth eliminated<\/a> the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services<\/a>. It had existed for nearly 75 years, focusing on issues including sexual harassment and assault. In January, he ordered a six-month review of women in combat roles<\/a>. In April, a woman who had been a whistleblower on sexual harassment within the Army Special Operations community was accused of sharing classified information and arrested<\/a> by the FBI.\u00a0Hegseth has also intervened to block<\/a> the promotions<\/a> of women officers.<\/p>\n In a statement to The Intercept, a spokesperson for the Army denied that its protections were insufficient.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Army has several programs and policies to protect service members who experience sexual assault or domestic violence,\u201d said Army spokesperson Heather Hagan.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When Spc. Mayra Diaz was assaulted on the Army base at Fort Hood, Texas, she was lucky to survive.<\/p>\n Diaz was blindfolded, with her hands bound over her head, having water poured on her face \u2014 \u201cwaterboarding me and causing me to choke,\u201d Diaz later wrote. Her attacker \u201cthen wrapped a cord around my neck in an attempt to kill me.\u201d<\/p>\n The assailant was a superior, Sgt. Greville Clarke, who knocked on her door at the barracks before threatening her with a pistol and raping her during the attack. The Army knew two other women<\/a> had been assaulted at the barracks in similar attacks; officials chose not to issue a public warning, citing concerns about compromising the investigation and causing potential panic.<\/p>\n The problems of homicide and suicide among women in the Army are inextricable from the prevalence of sexual assault. In some cases, like Diaz\u2019s, a sexual attack involves an attempt on a woman\u2019s life. Rape and sexual abuse are known to be detrimental to mental health<\/a>, increasing the risk of suicide or self harm.<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s a huge correlation between sexual assault and suicide rates,\u201d said Josh Connolly, senior vice president of Protect Our Defenders, an advocacy group for victims of military sexual trauma. \u201cIt\u2019s unambiguous \u2014 sexual assault rates are higher than in the civilian world.\u201d<\/p>\n The Intercept\u2019s investigation found suicide is the leading cause of death of Army women.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n Male soldiers faced a smaller increase in suicide rates compared to civilian men than Army women did compared to civilian women, and men in the Army have a lower risk of dying by homicide than their non-military counterparts.<\/p>\n In fact, The Intercept\u2019s investigation found, suicide is the leading cause of death of Army women.<\/p>\n Some cases have made national headlines<\/a>, such as the March 2023 death of Pvt. Ana Basaldua Ruiz at Fort Hood, who took her own life at 20 years old after reporting sexual harassment.<\/p>\n For Ruiz\u2019s family, the timing of her death raised troubling questions, echoing fellow Fort Hood soldier Vanessa Guill\u00e9n\u2019s infamous 2020 murder<\/a> by an Army specialist. A subsequent Army inquiry into Ruiz\u2019s case, reported by Telemundo, pointed to a \u201cpersistently toxic culture permissive of harassment.<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n Years earlier, in the wake of Guill\u00e9n\u2019s death, an independent review revealed \u201ca total disregard and disrespect for female soldiers.\u201d Investigators issued 70 recommendations, But the violence didn\u2019t stop. Women at Fort Hood continued to experience a grim roll call of harm: Homicide. Sexual assault. Suicides.<\/p>\n Three deaths at Fort Hood were never reported<\/a> publicly by the Army but appeared in the data obtained by The Intercept.<\/p>\n Counting Guill\u00e9n and Ruiz, there were nine fatalities from homicide or suicide among women stationed at the base in five years. The Defense Department\u2019s most recent suicide report does not provide data on how many suicide decedents experienced sexual trauma, although the Pentagon has provided this data in previous years<\/a>.<\/p>\n From 2001 to 2023, nearly 1 in 4 women service members experienced sexual assault, according to the Brown University\u2019s Costs of War<\/a> project, much higher than the numbers annually reported by the Pentagon. Research identifies those experiences as a key driver<\/a> of suicide risk<\/a>. Over the past two decades, suicide rates among women veterans have risen faster<\/a> than among men.<\/p>\n In Diaz\u2019s view, institutional failures were a key factor in her assault.<\/p>\n \u201cBecause the Army took no action to address the string of female soldiers attacked in their barracks,\u201d Diaz wrote in a federal tort claim, \u201cSergeant Clarke was empowered to continue preying on the female soldiers at Fort Hood, including me.\u201d<\/p>\n Clarke assaulted five women before he was apprehended October 2022 and convicted in 2025 of charges including attempted premeditated murder<\/a>. He died<\/a> by suicide in custody.<\/p>\n Diaz was \u201cin a U.S. Army base in a locked barracks, opening the door to someone in uniform. It was very reasonable for her to think that that was a safe thing to do,\u201d Christine Dunn, an attorney representing Diaz, told The Intercept. \u201cYou don\u2019t expect someone who\u2019s in a uniform to be a serial predator.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSergeant Clarke was empowered to continue preying on the female soldiers at Fort Hood, including me.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n Diaz wrote that leadership denied repeated requests to move her into family housing off-post, and only after she and her sexual assault representative made clear that remaining in the barracks was \u201can untenable environment\u201d was she finally allowed to leave.<\/p>\n \u201cI suffered from extreme paranoia, exacerbated by my attacker remaining at large,\u201d Diaz wrote. \u201cI abused alcohol in an attempt to forget what happened to me. \u2026 I began going to weekly therapy but have stopped going because I still find the attack very traumatizing to talk about.\u201d<\/p>\n The Army did not provide comment on Diaz\u2019s case or reports of Clarke\u2019s predation specifically.<\/p>\n The anxiety, Diaz wrote, has never fully gone away.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat happened to me was a result of the United States Department of the Army\u2019s and the Department of Defense\u2019s negligence,\u201d her complaint stated. \u201cIt was entirely preventable.\u201d<\/p>\n \n By signing up, I agree to receive emails from The Intercept and to the Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Use<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n Last year, Pete Hegseth directed<\/a> the Army to change its 15-6 regulation<\/a>, which governs the process for investigating military-related misconduct like sexual harassment. Now the first step is verifying the \u201ccredibility of accusers with new disciplinary measures<\/a> for soldiers who submit knowingly false or frivolous complaints.<\/p>\n Some fear the rule may discourage those experiencing sexual harassment from reporting incidents, perpetuating a \u201cculture of victim blaming,\u201d according to Protect Our Defenders\u2019 Connolly.<\/p>\n While Hegseth rolls back protections, the issue of violence against women in the military appears to be getting worse. The Intercept\u2019s analysis shows that from 2011 to 2020, the per capita rate of women dying by suicide or homicide in the Army was 15 per 100,000. From 2021 to 2024, following the Army\u2019s attempted reforms in the wake of Vanessa Guill\u00e9n\u2019s killing, the rate increased over 35 percent, to 21 per 100,000.<\/p>\n And deaths continued their pace in 2025.<\/p>\n Siegal McIntyre, the UNC professor studying domestic abuse, pointed to cases like that of Sgt. Francine Martinez, who was just weeks away from her 25th birthday on a night out at Fort Hood in September 2021, when she ran into the father of her child. He was a fellow soldier with whom she had recently separated, and Martinez had filed for child support weeks earlier.<\/a><\/p>\n An argument broke out, and when Martinez got into a car to leave, he followed<\/a>, and eventually shot her in the head. She was hospitalized for two weeks<\/a> before dying from her injuries, leaving behind her 1-year-old.<\/p>\n Research and Pentagon data indicate that rates of domestic and intimate partner violence in the military, particularly in the Army<\/a>, are higher than the civilian population. Most victims are women<\/a>, who also make up most of the homicide<\/a> cases tied to that violence<\/a>.<\/p>\n Martinez\u2019s death was one of three cases\u00a0the Defense Department reported<\/a> in 2021 in which service members killed someone in a domestic or interpersonal dispute.<\/p>\n But data compiled<\/a> by <\/a>The Intercept identified<\/a> at least seven cases<\/a> that year in which service members were suspected of killing a spouse<\/a> or partner in acts of domestic or intimate partner violence<\/a> \u2014 more than double the official count<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen the situation involves a marriage or partnership between agents and service members, it only complicates reporting,\u201d said Siegal McIntyre.<\/p>\n A Naval Criminal Investigative Service report<\/a> from 2021 suggests the number could be higher still, identifying several additional domestic violence-related homicides. The Intercept\u2019s investigation also found other years\u2019 congressionally mandated reports also have data tracking problems.<\/p>\n A Project on Government Oversight investigation revealed thousands of abuse cases involving Army personnel were mishandled<\/a>, many never entered into tracking systems. Investigators could only look at 10 out of more than 60 Army installations. A Government <\/a>Accountability Office report<\/a> found the Pentagon doesn\u2019t reliably screen for sexual assault when service members seek care or leave service and lacks systems to prioritize treatment or ensure confidential, long-term support.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t think there\u2019s a mechanism within the Army for holding itself accountable,\u201d said Dunn, who is also representing some of the 80 victims suing Army gynecologist<\/a> Maj. Blaine McGraw, who was assigned to Fort Hood in 2023; he has since been accused<\/a> of recording and making harmful physical contact with women during gynecological exams. (The Army did not comment on McGraw\u2019s case, which remains ongoing.)<\/p>\n Some women who came forward had gone to McGraw seeking rape kits for sexual assault<\/a> and say his actions further traumatized and distressed them.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen the institution is facilitating the assaults and allowing them to happen, the institution needs to be held accountable,\u201d Dunn said. \u201cAlmost every client who comes to me wants to come forward so that this wouldn\u2019t happen to other women.\u201d<\/p>\n In response to questions from The Intercept, the Army acknowledged having recorded more homicides than were noted in the dataset provided based on The Intercept\u2019s FOIA request.<\/p>\n Between 2021 and 2023, the Army recorded a total of 16 homicides among active-duty women, Hagan told The Intercept. The data provided to The Intercept for its FOIA request counts only nine.<\/p>\n Hagan did not respond to follow-up questions on the discrepancy, and the Army did not provide data outside the years 2021 to 2023.<\/p>\n But the additional homicides would make the disparities found by The Intercept\u2019s investigation even wider. If the same pattern of undercounting extends across the full 14-year span of our data, the true toll could be substantially higher.<\/p>\n After the independent review of Fort Hood following Guill\u00e9n\u2019s killing, Hagan said, the Army \u201cimplemented a series of major reforms to strengthen prevention, reporting, and accountability for sexual harassment and assault.\u201d It shifted its criminal investigations division to civilian leadership, requiring more independent investigations, establishing stricter missing-soldier response protocols, and expanding data-driven oversight of cases.<\/p>\n But the deaths have continued, including another homicide at Hood last year<\/a>. To advocates, there are other solutions to address these failures.<\/p>\n \u201cYou have to call DoD into Congress and demand answers on why progress hasn\u2019t been made,\u201d said Connolly. \u201cCongress could scrutinize the data on domestic violence and other issues. They can appropriate more resources to DV investigations and hold hearings.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe potential solution lies with how funding is or isn\u2019t tied to oversight,\u201d Siegal McIntyre said. \u201cWithout Congress doing its job, nothing can change.\u201d<\/p>\n Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., a House Armed Services Committee member and Air Force veteran, said The Intercept\u2019s findings reflect a broader failure of leadership and oversight.<\/p>\n \u201cThis report is staggering, and unfortunately, unsurprising,\u201d she said. \u201cServicewomen consistently bear the brunt of harassment, assault, retaliation, and systemic failures within the ranks, and it is costing them their careers, their safety, and in far too many cases, their lives.\u201d<\/p>\n In a 1995 Defense Department study<\/a> on homicide victims by gender, female service members across active-duty branches were killed at higher rates than both their male counterparts and women nationally. A Marine Corps<\/a> and Navy-specific study<\/a> covering 1995 to 1999 found similarly elevated risks.<\/p>\n The Pentagon never did further analysis. Ana Roque believes that change would fundamentally start with how the military builds itself to protect women like her daughter.<\/p>\n \u201cI understand that the country needs soldiers, but recruiters need to be more careful regarding where these individuals come from,\u201d Roque said. She called for more police and camera surveillance on bases, arguing that if it had been present, \u201cthey could have seen him moving my daughter\u2019s body in broad daylight.\u201d<\/p>\n She wishes she could have her daughter back.<\/p>\n \u201cShe always had a smile, no matter how difficult her day was,\u201d\u00a0Roque said. \u201cShe made time to help colleagues with various issues and never said no. I have many stories written in my notebook from soldiers and civilians who knew her and told me, \u2018She saved me,\u2019 simply by taking a minute to listen to them. She loved her family; we would talk three times a day: at 7 a.m., during my lunch break, and at night, when she would always say \u2018Good night, Mommy.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n Reporters working for The Intercept submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to the Pentagon seeking data on all U.S. Army active-duty noncombat deaths from 2011 through August 2025. In response, the Department of Defense provided a spreadsheet detailing 5,285 U.S. Army deaths over the 14-year period categorized by rank, gender, military occupation, and cause of death. The latter was classified as either illness, self-inflicted, accident, pending, or undetermined.<\/em><\/p>\n To calculate the per capita suicide and death rates for women in the U.S. Army in this time period, The Intercept pulled manpower data<\/a> from the Defense Department for each year in our analysis to provide the total number of women in the Army. National and international data on homicide and suicide was pulled from the FBI Crime Data Report<\/a>, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime<\/a>, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<\/a> in order to compare suicide and homicide rates.<\/em><\/p>\n There is no publicly available equivalent data for Army veterans, nor has such an analysis been done for the Navy, Air Force, or Marines.<\/em><\/p>\n The\u00a0988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline<\/a>\u00a0offers 24-hour support for those experiencing suicidal thoughts or for those close to them, by\u00a0chat<\/a>, text, or telephone.<\/em>\u00a0Service members can dial 988 and press 1 to reach the Military and Veterans Crisis Line. Support is free and confidential.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n #Army #Women #Killed #Army #Men #War<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Twenty-three-year-old Sarah Ro… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":31680,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[246],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31679"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31679\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/31680"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/infographics_homicide-types-2.png?fit=1417%2C910\")
\n
\n
\n We\u2019re independent of corporate interests \u2014 and powered by members. Join us. <\/h2>\n
\n Become a member
\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\n
\n Join Our Newsletter <\/span>
\n
\n Thank You For Joining! <\/span>
\n <\/h2>\n
\n Original reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you. <\/span>
\n
\n Will you take the next step to support our independent journalism by becoming a member of The Intercept? <\/span>\n <\/p>\n
\n Become a member
\n <\/a><\/p>\nFalse and Frivolous<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/infographics_homicide-rates.png?fit=1417%2C989\")
How we analyzed the data<\/h4>\n
\n