{"id":30720,"date":"2026-05-20T18:07:26","date_gmt":"2026-05-20T18:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/?p=30720"},"modified":"2026-05-20T18:07:26","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T18:07:26","slug":"user-talkbawolff-wikinews-the-free-news-source","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/?p=30720","title":{"rendered":"User talk:Bawolff – Wikinews, the free news source"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Smile!\"<\/a><\/span>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Your last review was in October 2021 which is nearly 3 years ago. Your last admin action was in March 2024 (technically), but it was an action that should not have been taken and one you later reverted. Outside of this, your last admin action was in October 2018, nearly 6 years ago. According to [[WN:PEP]] users who do not use those permissions for 2 years will have them removed. This is just a notice and I have not requested removal of your permissions. You will also be renotified at least once more before I make a request for removal of your permissions. Me Da Wikipedian<\/a> (talk<\/a>) 18:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n

\n
I defer to the wikinews community what rights they want me to have. Bawolff<\/a> ?<\/a>?<\/a> 19:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
Second notification, I might request removal of your reviewer and admin rights soon Me Da Wikipedian<\/a> (talk<\/a>) 11:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

Hi\n<\/p>\n

(I am messaging all reviewers)\n<\/p>\n

Hope you are doing well.\n<\/p>\n

Here are submitted for peer review:\n<\/p>\n

Could you please review? Even a little edit or just one review would help a lot. (I don’t require a commitment to review every day from now on.)\n<\/p>\n

Would you like to get notified of new drafts submitted for review? If so, please tell me which topics (or any topic) and where (email, wiki messages, push notification on smart phone, notification in wiki Notifications, or somewhere else).\n<\/p>\n

Would you find a WN:RNA<\/a> page for reviewers useful, it would be similar to WN:AAA<\/a> but intended for reviewers to discuss reviewing and related software.\n<\/p>\n

Would you be interested other communications off-wiki to create audio or video contact with other reviewers? I think this online gathering could be an essential part to deduce how to make article authoring and review easier. It could be just 30 minutes a month, and you don’t have to participate every time. I would write a meeting minutes note after each session and publish it on-wiki if desired.\n<\/p>\n

Thanks!\n<\/p>\n

Regards, Gryllida<\/a> (talk<\/a>) 11:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n

I am receiving two errors from EasyPeerReview when publishing. This is new behavior.\n<\/p>\n

Error 1: WWC error [step 1] [tell bawolff]:api is not a function\n<\/p>\n

Error 2: Easy Peer Review experienced some issue when creating opinion page.
\nPlease tell user:Bawolff<\/a> (include browser and technical details).
\nTechnical details: api is not a function\n<\/p>\n

Let me know if there is anything I can do on my end to help with debugging. \u2014Michael.C.Wright<\/a> (Talk<\/a><\/sup>\/Published<\/a><\/sub>) 16:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n

\n
I forgot to mention that WN:ML<\/a> has also stopped working for me; nothing happens when I click the “Make lead” button. I don’t know if the problems are related. \u2014Michael.C.Wright<\/a> (Talk<\/a><\/sup>\/Published<\/a><\/sub>) 16:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
Not sure what is going on here. Do other people also experience this issue? Bawolff<\/a> ?<\/a>?<\/a> 11:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
@RockerballAustralia<\/a>, Gryllida<\/a>: do either of you experience issues when using EasyPeerReview? See above for details. \u2014Michael.C.Wright<\/a> (Talk<\/a><\/sup>\/Published<\/a><\/sub>) 13:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
Not that I’ve noticed. I’ll certainly keep an eye out for it. Rockerball<\/a><\/b>Australia<\/a><\/i> contribs<\/a><\/small> 00:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/dd>\n
Is it still broken if you disable your \/common.js and meta \/global.js? Maybe there is some sort of conlict. Bawolff<\/a> ?<\/a>?<\/a> 01:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
I’ll have a play around with it to see what I can find out when I’ve got time. That should be sometime later this afternoon my time (UTC+10). Rockerball<\/a><\/b>Australia<\/a><\/i> contribs<\/a><\/small> 01:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
I used the tool twice today and in both cases the articles were ‘not-ready’d’ and I did not get any errors either time. I have only gotten the errors when the review results in a published article. I will test again with another article after first disabling the scripts as you proposed. \u2014Michael.C.Wright<\/a> (Talk<\/a><\/sup>\/Published<\/a><\/sub>) 15:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>; edited 15:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
\n
I suspect the conflict is with m:User:TenWhile6\/XReport.js<\/a>. I disabled \/common.js, which does not call XReport, and still received the two errors when publishing. However, after disabling XReport from \/global.js, I was again able to use WN:ML<\/a>. I will test easypeerreview again later with XReport disabled to see if that is indeed to culprit. \u2014Michael.C.Wright<\/a> (Talk<\/a><\/sup>\/Published<\/a><\/sub>) 16:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

The Task Force has released a report that formally recommends closing Wikinews. The public consultation is here: m:Public consultation about Wikinews<\/a>.Michael.C.Wright<\/a> (Talk<\/a><\/sup>\/Reviewer<\/a><\/sub>) 13:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)<\/a>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n

\n
A community response to the Task Force is underway and I believe it’s critical that we show clear support from contributors, reviewers, and administrators if we want Wikinews to remain open.<\/dd>\n
If you believe Wikinews still has potential for revitalization and should remain active, I ask that you:<\/dd>\n
\n