{"id":29008,"date":"2026-03-28T21:16:15","date_gmt":"2026-03-28T21:16:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/?p=29008"},"modified":"2026-03-28T21:16:15","modified_gmt":"2026-03-28T21:16:15","slug":"stanford-study-outlines-dangers-of-asking-ai-chatbots-for-personal-advice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/?p=29008","title":{"rendered":"Stanford study outlines dangers of asking AI chatbots for personal advice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p id=\"speakable-summary\" class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While there\u2019s been plenty of debate about the tendency of AI chatbots to flatter users and confirm their existing beliefs \u2014 also known as <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2025\/08\/25\/ai-sycophancy-isnt-just-a-quirk-experts-consider-it-a-dark-pattern-to-turn-users-into-profit\/\">AI sycophancy<\/a> \u2014 a new study by Stanford computer scientists attempts to measure how harmful that tendency might be.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The study, titled \u201cSycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence\u201d and <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.science.org\/doi\/10.1126\/science.aec8352\">recently published in Science<\/a>, argues, \u201cAI sycophancy is not merely a stylistic issue or a niche risk, but a prevalent behavior with broad downstream consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2026\/02\/25\/about-12-of-u-s-teens-turn-to-ai-for-emotional-support-or-advice\/\">According to a recent Pew report<\/a>, 12% of U.S. teens say they turn to chatbots for emotional support or advice. And the study\u2019s lead author, computer science Ph.D. candidate Myra Cheng, <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/news.stanford.edu\/stories\/2026\/03\/ai-advice-sycophantic-models-research\">told the Stanford Report<\/a> that she became interested in the issue after hearing that undergraduates were asking chatbots for relationship advice and even to draft breakup texts.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBy default, AI advice does not tell people that they\u2019re wrong nor give them \u2018tough love,\u2019\u201d Cheng said. \u201cI worry that people will lose the skills to deal with difficult social situations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The study had two parts. In the first, researchers tested 11 large language models, including OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT, Anthropic\u2019s Claude, Google Gemini, and DeepSeek, entering queries based on existing databases of interpersonal advice, on potentially harmful or illegal actions, and on the popular Reddit community <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/AmItheAsshole\/\">r\/AmITheAsshole<\/a> \u2014 in the latter case focusing on posts where Redditors concluded that the original poster was, in fact, the story\u2019s villain.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The authors found that across the 11 models, the AI-generated answers validated user behavior an average of 49% more often than humans. In the examples drawn from Reddit, chatbots affirmed user behavior 51% of the time (again, these were all situations where Redditors came to the opposite conclusion). And for the queries focusing on harmful or illegal actions, AI validated the user\u2019s behavior 47% of the time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In one example described in the Stanford Report, a user asked a chatbot if they were in the wrong for pretending to their girlfriend that they\u2019d been unemployed for two years, and they were told, \u201cYour actions, while unconventional, seem to stem from a genuine desire to understand the true dynamics of your relationship beyond material or financial contribution.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-techcrunch-inline-cta\">\n<div class=\"inline-cta__wrapper\">\n<p>Techcrunch event<\/p>\n<div class=\"inline-cta__content\">\n<p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"inline-cta__location\">San Francisco, CA<\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"inline-cta__separator\">|<\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"inline-cta__date\">October 13-15, 2026<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the second part, researchers studied how more than 2,400 participants interacted with AI chatbots \u2014 some sycophantic, some not \u2014 in discussions of their own problems or situations drawn from Reddit. They found that participants preferred and trusted the sycophantic AI more and said they were more likely to ask those models for advice again.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAll of these effects persisted when controlling for individual traits such as demographics and prior familiarity with AI; perceived response source; and response style,\u201d the study said. It also argued that users\u2019 preference for sycophantic AI responses creates \u201cperverse incentives\u201d where \u201cthe very feature that causes harm also drives engagement\u201d \u2014 meaning AI companies are incentivized to increase sycophancy, not reduce it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the same time, interacting with the sycophantic AI seemed to make participants more convinced that they were in the right, and made them less likely to apologize.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The study\u2019s senior author author Dan Jurafsky, a professor of both linguistics and computer science, added that while users \u201care aware that models behave in sycophantic and flattering ways [\u2026] what they are not aware of, and what surprised us, is that sycophancy is making them more self-centered, more morally dogmatic.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jurafsky said that AI sycophancy is \u201ca safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The research team is now examining ways to make models less sycophantic \u2014 apparently just starting your prompt with the phrase \u201cwait a minute\u201d can help. But Cheng said, \u201cI think that you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That\u2019s the best thing to do for now.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2026\/03\/28\/stanford-study-outlines-dangers-of-asking-ai-chatbots-for-personal-advice\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While there\u2019s been plenty of d&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29009,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[249],"tags":[10450],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29008"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29008"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29008\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/29009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}