![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/AP26051534004836.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
President Donald Trump paid a price for going it alone on tariffs \u2014 with the Supreme Court on Friday delivering a rare rebuke by ruling he lacked the power to declare an economic emergency and launch sweeping new taxes on imports.<\/p>\n
Trump had made tariffs the bedrock of his economic pitch to voters going into the midterm elections, even describing tariffs as his \u201cfavorite word in the dictionary.\u201d He promised that factories would relocate from overseas and bring jobs with them, and he warned that losing the tariffs could plunge the U.S. into a deep recession.<\/p>\n
But Friday\u2019s ruling will most likely prolong political and economic chaos over international trade through the election year.<\/p>\n
Trump described the ruling as \u201cdeeply disappointing\u201d and \u201cridiculous,\u201d adding that he was \u201cabsolutely ashamed\u201d of the six Supreme Court justices who ruled against him \u201cfor not having the courage to do what\u2019s right for our country.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThey\u2019re just being fools and lap dogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats,\u201d Trump said of the high court majority in an afternoon press briefing, referring to \u201cRepublicans in Name Only.\u201d \u201cThey\u2019re very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n
He vowed to bypass Congress and impose new tariffs on his own under existing law. He also insisted that the high court ruling brought \u201cgreat certainty\u201d to the economy.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s far from certain.<\/p>\n
The president acknowledged that some trade deals recently negotiated would stay in place while others would not. He also predicted years of legal wrangling to determine whether his administration must return billions of dollars in tariff revenue already paid by other countries.<\/p>\n
Trump learned of the decision after being handed a note during a private meeting with several governors in the morning, according to two people with knowledge of the president\u2019s reaction who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Another person, who was briefed on the conversation, disclosed that Trump said he has \u201cto do something about these courts.\u201d<\/p>\n
The meeting with the governors ended shortly after Trump learned of the decision.<\/p>\n
Republican strategist Doug Heye said it was immediately clear that the president \u201cis not going to be happy\u201d about the decision.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re starting to hear about how this is a massive blow, a massive repudiation,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
However, Heye said Trump will try to find another way to pursue his trade agenda.<\/p>\n
\u201cAre they going to be able to figure out how to use this as an opportunity or not?\u201d he asked. \u201cThere are too many questions.\u201d<\/p>\n
The White House plans to use alternative laws to preserve his tariffs, but those policies will only prolong the debate and keep alive an issue that is largely unpopular with voters.<\/p>\n
About 6 in 10 Americans said Trump had gone too far on imposing new tariffs on other countries, according to an AP-NORC poll from January.<\/p>\n
Even more worrisome for a president elected on the promise of fixing Americans\u2019 concerns about affordability, 76% said in a poll conducted last April that Trump\u2019s tariff policies would increase the cost of consumer goods in the U.S.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s aggressive use of tariffs had left many Republican lawmakers uneasy, publicly and privately, forcing them to defend what were essentially tax increases on the American public and businesses.<\/p>\n
At various points during Trump\u2019s second term, at least seven senators from the president\u2019s party have voiced their concerns. Earlier this month, six House Republicans joined with Democrats to vote for a resolution against Trump\u2019s tariffs on Canada.<\/p>\n
Indeed, free trade had long been a central plank of the Republican Party before Trump\u2019s rise to power.<\/p>\n
Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell described Trump\u2019s assertion that he can bypass Congress to implement tariffs as \u201cillegal\u201d in a statement praising the Supreme Court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n
\u201cCongress\u2019 role in trade policy, as I have warned repeatedly, is not an inconvenience to avoid,\u201d the former top Senate Republican said. \u201cIf the executive would like to enact trade policies that impact American producers and consumers, its path forward is crystal clear: convince their representatives under Article 1\u201d of the Constitution.<\/p>\n
Former Vice President Mike Pence, who served during Trump\u2019s first term, cheered the ruling as a victory for the public, the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution and free trade.<\/p>\n
\u201cAmerican families and American businesses pay American tariffs \u2014 not foreign countries,\u201d Pence wrote on social media. \u201cWith this decision, American families and businesses can breathe a sigh of relief.\u201d<\/p>\n
Democrats were quick to seize on the opportunity given to them by the Supreme Court, with Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., saying that Trump \u201cis not a king\u201d and his \u201ctariffs were always illegal.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cRepublicans in Congress could have easily ended this economic crisis by standing up for their communities,\u201d said DelBene, chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. \u201cInstead, they chose to bend the knee to Trump while families, small businesses, and farmers suffered from higher prices.\u201d<\/p>\n
The ruling essentially allows Trump\u2019s critics to say that he broke the law and that middle class families suffered as a result.<\/p>\n
But Trump has claimed that his tariffs were the difference between national prosperity and deep poverty, a pitch he made on Thursday night to voters in the swing state of Georgia.<\/p>\n
The president used the word \u201ctariff\u201d 28 times in his speech Thursday at a Georgia steel company, Coosa Steel, which credited the import taxes as making its products more competitive with goods from China.<\/p>\n
\u201cWithout tariffs, this country would be in such trouble right now,\u201d Trump charged.<\/p>\n
Trump also complained that he had to justify his use of tariffs to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n
\u201cI have to wait for this decision. I\u2019ve been waiting forever, forever, and the language is clear that I have the right to do it as president,\u201d he said. \u201cI have the right to put tariffs on for national security purposes, countries that have been ripping us off for years.\u201d<\/p>\n
By a 6-3 vote, the high court said no.<\/p>\n
The president has consistently misrepresented his tariffs, claiming despite evidence to the contrary that foreign governments would pay them and that the revenues would be sufficient to pay down the national debt and give taxpayers a dividend check.<\/p>\n
New research\u00a0tied to one of America\u2019s leading banks found on Thursday that tariffs paid by midsize U.S. businesses tripled over the course of the past year.<\/p>\n
The additional taxes have meant that companies that employ a combined 48 million people in the U.S. \u2014 the kinds of businesses that Trump had promised to revive \u2014 have had to find ways to absorb the\u00a0new expense, by passing it along to customers in the form of higher prices, employing fewer workers or accepting lower profits.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s tariffs \u2014 not all of which were overturned \u2014 were expected to generate $3 trillion in revenues over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That sum is large, but it would insufficient to cover the costs of the projected deficits.<\/p>\n
The Supreme Court has not ruled on how any refund process would work.<\/p>\n
___<\/p>\n
Associated Press writer Steven Sloan contributed to this report.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
#Trump #ruling #violated #Constitution #Justices #disloyal #Constitution<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
President Donald Trump paid a … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23692,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2],"tags":[485,1398,486,13865,5233,489,491,599,12583],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23691"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23691\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microvibenews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}