<\/p>\n
Deciding to retire and turning one\u2019s investments into an income\/pension is a huge decision, and frankly requires a much more in-depth analysis of a client\u2019s needs than can be gleaned from the few variables provided.<\/p>\n
It is not only unwise but against Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services (Fais) regulations for any advisor to give advice without a full understanding of the client and their long-term needs, so please excuse me if what I mention below is vague and general.<\/p>\n
\nDecisions made at this point often cannot be reversed, so it is very important that you and your mother get professional advice as soon as possible.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Before getting into some of the nitty-gritty of the options, I would suggest that the early retiree garner a very good understanding of her retirement income needs. (I have a RedFile [AI] organisational system that includes balance sheet and income statement templates \u2013 free on request).<\/p>\n
ERPs (if they are properly structured as a severance benefit) are usually taxed at retirement fund rates, but they will erode the tax-free lump sum. Going on the limited details provided, it looks like the ERP would pay out around R540 000 \u2013 which would use up the tax-free lump sum \u2013 but could then be used to fund the car and emergency fund.<\/p>\n
Read:<\/p>\n
Treasury slashes early retirement costs<\/div>\nWhy the last 10 years before retirement matter most<\/div>\nI am not sure why you think that the full pension will be taxed \u2013\u00a0this would only happen if she were to cash it in (using vested rights prior to the two-pot system). I do not recommend this.<\/p>\n
Just based on the information provided, I would potentially recommend that your mother \u2018preserves\u2019 the retirement fund (by resigning rather than retiring \u2013 as long as it doesn\u2019t impact her ERP), and then \u2018retires\u2019 from the preservation into a living annuity once she has a clear understanding of her future income needs (these can happen almost back to back and there is no increased cost).<\/p>\n
There are some very important considerations, and perhaps a greater understanding of the fund rules and the tax implications of retirement savings before any professional would be able to give advice on the best way forward.<\/p>\n
Read:
Ten costs that may rise in retirement
The \u2018perfect\u2019 retirement lump sum: A costly mistake?
Protecting your retirement income: How long can a downturn last?<\/p>\nBecause of her relatively young age, and the reality that she may need this income, rising with inflation, for 40 years, it is very important that the living annuity\u00a0be prudently drawn down (a maximum of, say, 4.5% per annum) and invested in a cost-effective, decent performance, low-fee environment.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, R3.4 million is not enough to replace her current income, growing with inflation indefinitely (before tax \u2013 annuities are taxed as income too).<\/p>\n
\nAt a 4.5% annual drawdown, she would need approximately R21 million to get a monthly income of R40 000.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
This is why it is so important for future retirees to have a good understanding of their future, family, and income needs.<\/p>\n
If your mother is alone and has no other sources of income, then the dramatic decrease in income is going to come as a huge shock. If she has a partner who is still working, or has a decent pension, then less so.<\/p>\n
Can you see why there is never a one-size-fits-all answer?<\/p>\n
Bottom line, I strongly recommend that your mother speaks to an independent financial advisor before making any decisions, and that they come up with several solutions and recommendations. (This is not going to make me popular \u2013 but if the advisor wants to charge an upfront fee as well as an ongoing fee \u2013 as they are \u2018allowed to\u2019 \u2013 then look elsewhere.)<\/p>\n
Read:
How much is \u2018enough\u2019 for retirement?
Retirement annuities: From tax deductions to the two-pot retirement system
More than numbers: What a true financial plan should deliver<\/p>\nAge 56 is very young to retire, and she could easily live another 40 years, and the income produced will have to grow with inflation (with medical aid inflation treated separately) over that entire period, with capital appreciation to ensure that happens.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n