<\/p>\n
Billionaire private equity investor and ex-banker Michael Jordaan likes to share his views on X, starting 2026 with a post on the controversial issue that government must give legal title to people staying on communal land.<\/p>\n
\u201cSome 13% of land in SA is held by tribal authorities. 17 million people or a third of our population live on these communal lands. Giving title deeds would turn poor rural dwellers into property owners,\u201d he says in his post, which links to a longer discourse published on the website of his investment firm, Montegray Capital.<\/p>\n
Read:
17m South Africans live on communal land \u2026 [2024]
Who owns the traditional \u2018family home\u2019 in SA? [2025]<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is one major initiative that would move the earth: giving legal title to many millions of families who are living freely and openly on land that notionally does not belong to them.<\/p>\n
\u201cAllocating title deeds to these subsistence farmers would turn impoverished rural dwellers into property owners. Newly titled farmland could be leveraged for development loans or eventually even sold,\u201d he adds.<\/p>\n
\u201cEither way, this would unlock and unleash massive capital for growth. In one fell swoop, a third of our citizens would build wealth through property appreciation while having stability and control over their livelihoods.<\/p>\n
Listen: New digital evaluation tool to change rural property landscape<\/p>\n
\u201cThey could make changes and improvements to their properties without the threat that their living rights could arbitrarily be taken away,\u201d he said, adding that some deal will need to be struck with tribal authorities to compensate them for losing their vested interests in administering these lands.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe individuals affected could also become landowners themselves. Or they could receive a monetary incentive to relinquish control.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cThe prize of creating 13 million new landowners would be worth the price,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Jordaan recognises that land reform is both a crucial economic and political issue, and that a large part of the black population was removed from their land and confined to homelands during apartheid.<\/p>\n
\n\nADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u201cBarring black South Africans from land ownership in large parts of the country resulted in exclusion from economic opportunities,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
Read:
Social housing in South Africa is in trouble \u2013 here\u2019s why
SA hastens title deed handover to poor homes<\/p>\n\u201cLand is important for livelihoods and food security. It holds deep symbolic meaning as an acute loss during apartheid, but also as hope for a more inclusive and fair future.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jordaan further calls on authorities to give title deeds to the five million South Africans that are living in informal settlements and, in the future, further overall land reform.<\/p>\n
Considerations<\/strong><\/p>\n
Some of Jordaan\u2019s followers on X were quick to highlight potential issues with the proposal, especially the rather obvious one of political control.<\/p>\n
Jacques Joubert points out that tribal leaders influence the way their subjects vote. The proof of this is that political parties go and seek favour with traditional leaders before every election.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cIn some rural areas of SA, traditional chiefs still decide or heavily influence who people vote for during elections,\u201d he adds.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Many of these chiefs were bribed or co-opted by the apartheid government to enforce its policies and maintain control in the homelands.<\/p>\n
\u201cI wonder whether, after the apartheid regime fell in 1994, the ANC simply continued this pattern, taking over the role of providing patronage or incentives to secure the loyalty and electoral support of these chiefs in rural constituencies.<\/p>\n
\n\nADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u201cThe ANC may have regarded it as political suicide to alienate the chiefs by issuing title deeds to rural people, i.e. taking away their control over the land and the people living under their custodianship.\u201d<\/p>\n
Joubert then ask the crucial question: \u201cAfrican feudalism?\u201d<\/p>\n
It seems like a valid argument. Traditional leaders won\u2019t allow \u2018their\u2019 land to be taken away and given to their poor subjects, and no politician will champion the issue.<\/p>\n
Property tax<\/strong><\/p>\n
Another consideration is that individual owners would have to pay property tax \u2013 once the close-to-impossible tasks of land surveying, physically marking boundaries, settling disputes, distributing title deeds, and completing a valuation process are done.<\/p>\n
Read: Soweto\u2019s bustling residential property market<\/p>\n
In contrast, legislation allows municipalities to exempt traditional lands from property tax.<\/p>\n
\nPoliticians empower municipalities to keep traditional leaders and their subjects happy in exchange for their votes every five years to keep their jobs.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Traditional leaders receive an extra incentive to keep the status quo in the form of considerable salaries and living cost allowances from government.<\/p>\n
Read:
Townships: Europeans cashing in where locals fear to tread
Hidden R3trn property wealth could unlock SA growth and inclusion<\/p>\nProperty tax would not be a big issue in informal settlements, as properties \u2013 once the owner receives a title deed \u2013 would probably not be liable for rates and taxes in that most municipalities grant exemptions and rebates to properties valued below a certain threshold.<\/p>\n
\n\nADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Academic<\/strong><\/p>\n
Jordaan acknowledges the long-term challenges of the idea, alluding to the fact that people may be tempted to quickly cash in their new capital.<\/p>\n
\u201cIdeally, all of these titling programmes need to be done as part of a comprehensive improvement of socio-economic conditions such as access to data, training, schooling and transport.<\/p>\n
Read: Land reform: How new landholders can prosper from wildlife, not just farming<\/p>\n
\u201cCommunity participation to address the root causes of poverty, improve living conditions but also to stop opportunism when titles become available, will certainly be needed. And, of course, further overall land reform beyond titling will still be required,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n
\nThe debate is largely academic.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
SA has a \u2018mixed\u2019 economy that includes a private sector based on capitalism and a government and associated organisations that lean towards socialism, as well as a feudal system comprising nearly a third of the population.<\/p>\n
Listen\/read: Bring on blockchain: Only 3% of\u00a0Africans qualify for mortgage\u00a0financing<\/p>\n
It seems unlikely that any one of these groupings will change its mindset.<\/p>\n
Follow Moneyweb\u2019s in-depth finance and business news on WhatsApp here.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n