The potential introduction of a 20% national tax on the gross gambling revenue of all forms of online gambling may very well violate the Constitution.\u00a0Commentators are also of the view that it undermines democratic practice due to the lack of meaningful consultation with those who will be affected.<\/p>\n
The Free Market Foundation calls the proposal \u201ca naked revenue grab that threatens the very existence of the legal gambling market\u201d.<\/p>\n
Read: South Africa weighs 20% tax\u00a0on online gambling [Nov 2025]<\/p>\n
Revenue from legal gambling is widely regarded as a far safer alternative than the technically illegal, unregulated activity of interactive gambling.<\/p>\n
Ayanda Zulu, political studies graduate from the University of Pretoria and an intern at the Free Market Foundation, says in a published article the \u201cbizarre proposal\u201d should not see the light of day.<\/p>\n
In terms of the National Gambling Act, gambling regulation is effectively a provincial competence. While the national government plays a role in oversight and coordination, the provinces retain primary authority over regulatory responsibilities.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis means that a national tax is unconstitutional because its centralisation of fiscal responsibility ignores clear jurisdictional boundaries and the limits placed on the national government,\u201d Zulu says in an article published by the foundation on Tuesday.<\/p>\n
Gambling taxes<\/strong><\/p>\n National Treasury published its discussion document at the end of last year, immediately provoking some harsh criticism from affected parties.<\/p>\n ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Currently gamblers who receive a once-off windfall from gambling are not taxed on their winnings while those who generate a frequent income from gambling are obliged to declare this as taxable income.<\/p>\n Listen\/read: Government has made gambling tax proposals in the past, but none of them saw the light of day. Treasury proposed a 15% withholding tax on gambling winnings above R25\u00a0000 in 2011, including those from the National Lottery.<\/p>\n It was supposed to be implemented from 1 April 2012. However, after consultation it was discovered that there would be complexities with enforcement and compliance, Treasury says in its discussion document.<\/p>\n In the 2012 Budget, a national gambling tax based on gross gambling revenue was proposed for introduction in April 2013.<\/p>\n The tax was going to take the form of an additional 1% national levy on a uniform provincial gambling tax base, and a similar tax base was to be used to tax the national lottery. Again, it was not implemented.<\/p>\n Treasury is now back with a new option to address the negative \u201cexternalities\u201d (social harm) caused by problem gambling.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n It is also aiming to reduce the proliferation of online gambling activities.<\/p>\n It wants a 20% national tax on online gambling that would be in addition to the current provincial taxes of between 6% and 9% on the gross gambling revenue of gambling operators (total turnover less winnings paid to players).<\/p>\n ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The rationale behind the higher tax rate on online gambling is because (at least) physical casinos generate employment and investment in infrastructure and higher expenditure on accommodation. \u201cFew, if any, similar benefits are associated with online gambling,\u201d Treasury argues.<\/p>\n Read: This practice of higher online gambling taxes is already prevalent in other jurisdictions.<\/p>\n Source: Derived from the Global Tax Tracker<\/p>\n<\/div>\n National Gambling Board data for the 2024\/25 financial year indicates that about R1.5 trillion was wagered in the South African gambling industry.<\/p>\n \u201cAt the current levels of gross gambling revenue, the 20% tax on gambling would translate into over R10 billion in additional revenue for national government. However, the main\u00a0objective of the reform would not be to raise further revenue, but rather to discourage\u00a0problem and pathological gambling and their ill effects,\u201d says Treasury.<\/p>\n This tax is a separate and additional independent national tax that would share the same tax base as the provincial gambling tax on gross gambling revenue but \u201cwould also include any revenue from interactive gambling\u201d.<\/p>\n Moral crusade<\/strong><\/p>\n ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n Zulu says the proposal comes against the backdrop of a moral crusade against interactive gambling in South Africa.<\/p>\n Online betting with licensed bookmakers is allowed, but most other forms of interactive gambling (like online casinos) is technically illegal. The Gambling Amendment Act of 2008 was never promulgated.<\/p>\n \u201cTherefore, the proposal of a national tax on it [interactive gambling] constitutes an inversion of the basic rule of law logic,\u201d says Zulu.<\/p>\n \u201cInstead of first attending to the question of whether a regulated interactive market is desirable, Treasury is quietly opting to chase easy revenue.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n While interactive gambling is a vice and overindulgence has naturally placed it on the agenda, the conversation surrounding its regulation should be a robust one that considers all angles and resists moralising uniformity.<\/p>\n He adds that meaningful consultation is a core component of democratic practice that ensures legitimacy, accountability, and genuine participation by all stakeholders.<\/p>\n The bypassing of preliminary engagement with some stakeholders \u201cstrongly suggests\u201d that National\u00a0Treasury is not committed to democratic practices, but rather ticking boxes aimed at paving the way for its own agenda.<\/p>\n Listen:\u00a0Who\u2019s really responsible for SA\u2019s gambling crisis?<\/p>\n Follow Moneyweb\u2019s in-depth finance and business news on WhatsApp here.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
Betting on desperation: How the poor are fueling SA\u2019s gambling boom<\/p>\n\n
Online betting advertising spend soars
TFG says \u2018almost entirely extractive\u2019 online gambling is greater threat than Shein<\/p>\n![\"online](\"https:\/\/www.moneyweb.co.za\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Online-gambling-taxes-globally-555x907.png\")
<\/p>\n\n